Atomic Clock : I think this comment is particularly interesting, given that the administration is trying very hard to tamp concerns about Iran's nuclear program, stressing several times for technical problems Iranian scientists say they know:

To assuage fears about Iran's progress, the administration claims that Tehran could take as much as a year to raise its low enriched uranium to weapons quality. The International Atomic Clock Energy Agency (IAEA), while recognizing that it could indeed take this long, also said it can take as little as three months. Theoretical calculations based on the support of Iran known capacity exceeded by the IAEA. There is also the risk that Iran has one or more sites secret centrifuge (he was taken to a building recently). If one of these sites exist, the estimate of the administration - on the basis of the sites that we know exist - is meaningless.

But why quibble about the length of the final phase of the bomb could do? Instead, we must keep our eyes on the big fact here is that Iran is rapidly approaching the status of a "virtual" state of nuclear weapons - one with the ability to expel inspectors UN and build a few nuclear warheads. This is not an argument for bombing Iran, Israel or anyone else. But it is a warning - a warning that we must confront the growing nuclear capabilities of Iran, and not be lulled into imagining that this is not real. via

Follow @jadwalbolainfo